Legal Opinion

State v. Little

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 3, 1981No. 8018SC770PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant first contends that the court erred by failing to charge the jury on the lesser included offense of misdemeanor assault. We agree.

Defendant tendered a request, in apt time, for the jury to be instructed upon the offense of simple assault. Simple assault is clearly a lesser included offense of assault with intent to commit rape. 1 As a general proposition, the judge has a duty to declare and explain the law arising on all of the evidence. G.S. 15A-1232; see State v. Leslie, 42 N.C. App. 81, 255 S.E. 2d 635 (1979). This duty necessarily requires the judge to charge upon…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. RieraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. HudsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. GammonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. LinerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. State v. LangCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. ShubertCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. State v. FranksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API