State v. Wright
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
At the outset, we note that defendant has abandoned assignments of error 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 9 by failing to advance any argument to support them in his brief. Rule 28(a), North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. By the assignments of error prop erly preserved for our review, defendant raises two basic questions: (1) whether the trial court should have instructed the jury about certain lesser included offenses, as requested, and (2) whether the trial court should have instructed the jury sua sponte to disregard the district attorney’s reference to the facts of a decided…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. RieraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. RedfernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- State v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. MillsapsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. CummingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.