State v. Lang
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BECTON, Judge.
The defendant raises two issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court, in its instructions on kidnapping, should have submitted to the jury the lesser included offense of false imprisonment; and (2) whether the trial court should have allowed a witness to testify to the time a store closed based upon the witness’ reading of a coded disk from an automatic time-lock device. For the reasons that follow, we believe the defendant is entitled to a new trial.
I
The crime of false imprisonment is a lesser included offense of the crime of kidnapping. State v. Bynum, 282 N.C. 552, 193 S.E.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. RieraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. ThackerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. GammonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- State v. BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. PigottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. WhitakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. MangumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- State v. BoozerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.