Legal Opinion

State v. Lang

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 6, 1982No. 8128SC1242PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

The defendant raises two issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court, in its instructions on kidnapping, should have submitted to the jury the lesser included offense of false imprisonment; and (2) whether the trial court should have allowed a witness to testify to the time a store closed based upon the witness’ reading of a coded disk from an automatic time-lock device. For the reasons that follow, we believe the defendant is entitled to a new trial.

I

The crime of false imprisonment is a lesser included offense of the crime of kidnapping. State v. Bynum, 282 N.C. 552, 193 S.E.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. RieraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. ThackerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. GammonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. State v. BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. PigottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. State v. WhitakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. MangumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. State v. BoozerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API