Legal Opinion

State v. Franks

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1985No. 8426SC990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

The issue is whether the court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on false imprisonment, a lesser included offense of kidnapping. We hold that the court did not err.

The necessity for instructing as to a lesser included offense arises only when there is evidence from which the jury could find that the crime of lesser degree was committed. State v. Bradshaw, 27 N.C. App. 485, 487, 219 S.E. 2d 561, 562, disc. rev. denied, 289 N.C. 299, 222 S.E. 2d 699 (1975). “The presence of such evidence is the determinative factor.” Id., quoting State v. Melton, 15 N.C. App. 198, 189 S.E.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. RosemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. State v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. GammonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SurrettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. State v. PendergrassCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. In re HowettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API