Legal Opinion
State v. Wilcox
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 18, 2007No. AC 28426PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, C. J.
The plaintiff in error, Howard Wilcox, brings a writ of error challenging the decision of the defendant in error, the sentence review division of the Superior Court (panel), affirming his sentence. On appeal, the plaintiff in error claims that the panel improperly denied his motion for a continuance in contravention of Practice Book § 43-27. We dismiss the writ of error.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of this issue. Following a jury trial in 1997, the plaintiff in error was convicted of kidnapping in the first degree in violation of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stamford Landing Condominium Ass'n v. LermanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Gaida v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- In re WoodmancyMohegan Trial Court · 2008
- State v. BrandtConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008