Legal Opinion

State v. Brandt

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 5, 2010No. AC 30760Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEACH, J.

To satisfy the second offender requirements established by the statute proscribing driving while intoxicated, the conduct forming the basis for the second offense must occur after the conviction for the first offense. Because the trial court held to the contrary in ruling on a motion to vacate pleas and sentences, we reverse in part the court’s judgments. The defendant, Wesley E. Brandt, appeals from the judgments of the trial court convicting him of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs and sentencing him, in accordance with his guilty pleas, as a repeat…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. RothenbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. State v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. Friezo v. FriezoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API