Legal Opinion

In re Woodmancy

Mohegan Trial Court

Decided December 30, 2008No. CV-08-0132Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

JANE W. FREEMAN, Judge.

The Petitioner, Kathleen Woodmancy (“Petitioner”), has petitioned the Court to authorize distributions from the grantor trust established by the Mohegan Tribe (“Tribe”) for her benefit. The Tribe contributes per capita benefits to grantor trusts for future distribution to minor Tribal members, in order to provide for their future safety and well being. MTC § 2-183(h). The Tribe has filed an Answer stating that it takes no position on the petition.

The Court has jurisdiction of the parties. The Petitioner is a member of the Tribe (Ex. 2) and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McWeeny v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. QuidgeonMohegan Trial Court · 2006
  3. CloutierMohegan Trial Court · 2006
  4. Seidel v. Mohegan Tribe of Indians of ConnecticutMohegan Trial Court · 2005
  5. State v. WilcoxConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API