Legal Opinion
Gaida v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 27, 2008No. AC 28421PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, J.
The plaintiffs, Josephine Gaida and Jack Gaida, appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their appeal from the decision of the defendant, the planning and zoning commission of the city of Shelton (commission), approving an amendment to the zoning map that changed the zone of the plaintiffs’ property from a primarily light industrial zone (LA-2) with a small portion in a residential zone (R-l) to an entirely residential zone. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly concluded that (1) notice of the rescheduled public hearing was not required to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. BretonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Bartram v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Iovieno v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Morningside Assn. v. Planning & Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commissioner of Public Safety v. Freedom of Information CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Gaida v. Planning & Zoning Commission of SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Gaida v. Planning & Zoning Commission of SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Gaida v. Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Greenwood Manor, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.