Hoopeston Canning Co. v. Cullen
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
The New York Insurance Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 28), as amended in 1939, provides a comprehensive and detailed plan for regulation of all types of insurance and insurance companies “doing an insurance business” (§41) in that state. Article 12, applicable to reciprocal insurance associations, defines them as aggregations of persons, firms, or corporations, who under a common name engage in the business of exchanging contracts of insurance on the reciprocal plan through an attorney in fact.
The issue in this case is whether the appellants, reciprocal insurance associations which insure against fire…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Tigner v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by265 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Travelers Health Assn. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
260 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.