Legal Opinion
United States v. Scophony Corp. of America
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 26, 1948No. 41PublishedCited by 320 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rutledge
The appellee Scophony, Limited is a British corporation which has its offices and principal place of business in London, England. The question is whether that company “transacted business” and was “found” within the Southern District of New York under § 12 of the Clayton Act,1 so that it could be sued and served there in a civil proceeding charging violation of §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. 26 Stat. 209, 50 Stat. 693, 15 U. S. C. §§ 1, 2. The violations stated were that Scophony and the other defendants2 had monopolized, attempted to monopolize, and conspired to restrain and monopolize…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by320 opinions
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Daniel v. American Board of Emergency MedicineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Myers v. American Dental Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Sokolow v. Palestine Liberation OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corp. v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
315 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.