Legal Opinion
United States v. Outlaw
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided March 14, 2001No. 3:00-cv-00198PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR A DAUBERT HEARING AND MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE
FURGESON, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendation, filed November 16, 2000, in the above-styled matter. The Defendant filed specific objections to the findings on January 8, 2001. After conducting a de novo review, the Court is of the opinion that the Defendant’s Motion for Daubert Hearing and Motion to Suppress Evidence and should be DENIED.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
A district court reviews de…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Deschenes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
- State v. Tam Thi Thu NguyenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- State v. NguyenOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- United States v. Three Hundred Sixty-Nine Thousand Nine Hundred Eighty Dollars ($369,980) in United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.