State v. Tam Thi Thu Nguyen
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Defendant was arrested, charged, and convicted of possession of more than ten pounds of marijuana and possession with the intent to distribute or dispense more than one pound of marijuana. She was apprehended when a drug detection dog sniffed the substance in the trunk of her rental car. She moved to suppress the evidence on the grounds that the dog was not a reliable drug detector and did not properly “indicate” the presence of marijuana. We conclude (1) that the dog was reliable based on its certification and training, and (2) the response it displayed to its law…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Terry L. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- State v. EnglandTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. TheinWashington Supreme Court · 1999
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Jones v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2009
- State v. DeneuiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State of Iowa v. Stephen Scott PrushaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
- State v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.