Deschenes v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PATRICK A. PIRTLE, Justice.
Appellant, David Deschenes, was convicted by a jury of money laundering in violation of § 34.02(a)(1) of the Texas Penal Code and sentenced to ten years confinement, suspended for ten years, and a $10,000 fine. Appellant contends: (1) the evidence at trial was legally insufficient to support his conviction; (2) the evidence at trial was factually insufficient to support his conviction; and (3) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. We reverse his conviction and render judgment of acquittal.
Background
I. Appellant’s Arrest
On January…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Malik v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wesbrook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Sieffert v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009
- O'Brien v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
- $43,774.00 U.S. Currency v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
- Gustavo Dominguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2013
- King v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.