State v. Nguyen
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Handwork, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals from the judgment of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas, which granted the motion of defendantsappellees, Can T. Nguyen, Quang T. Ton, and Thach Wana, to discover the field performance records (“real world reports”) of a trained and certified drug dog.
Part I: Facts and Statement of the Case
{¶ 2} On January 1, 2003, Trooper Stacey Arnold of the Ohio State Highway Patrol was assigned to criminal patrol at the Findlay post. As a certified canine handler, Trooper Arnold was accompanied by her drug dog, Ringo.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited81 opinions
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. KleinOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. LopezOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. LaveroniDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- State v. BrooksOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. DixonOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. Nguyen, L-05-1369 (4-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.