Legal Opinion
United States v. Bailey
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided October 25, 1995No. 2:95-cr-00138PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIERY, District Judge.
In conjunction with the Court’s Order of September 7, 1995, holding the Child Support Recovery Act (“CSRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 228, unconstitutional, the following opinion is issued:
Once upon a time, Keith and Lisa Bailey were, or at least thought they were, in love. The courtship culminated in marriage and the birth of a child. Alas, the ardor cooled and divorce ensued, with custody of the child being placed with Ms. Bailey. Believing custodial parents like Ms. Bailey needed additional means to collect unpaid child support payments, in 1992 Congress passed 18 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Ankenbrandt Ex Rel. L. R. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Perez v. LedesmaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kugler v. HelfantSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Frank P. Bongiorno, United States of America v. Frank P. BongiornoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Ricky L. HampshireCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Samuel D. SageCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Keith Douglas BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Nathan Wall (95-5007) and Donald Wall (95-5008)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.