Legal Opinion

United States v. Keith Douglas Bailey

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 12, 1997No. 95-50721PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUHÉ, Circuit Judge:

We consider for the first time the reach of Congress’s authority to enact under the Commerce Clause the Child Support Recovery Act, 18 U.S.C. § 228, which makes it a federal crime to “willfully fail[ ] to pay a past due support obligation with respect to a child who resides in another state.” We conclude that the Act passes constitutional muster under Congress’s plenary powers to regulate both the use of the channels of interstate commerce and persons or things in interstate commerce. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

BACKGROUND

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Ankenbrandt Ex Rel. L. R. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. United States v. Bruce Carneil Webster, A/K/A B-LoveCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. Deem v. DiMella-DeemCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  3. Groome Resources Ltd, Llc, United States of America, Intervenor v. Parish of JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Louis JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Jimmy Lee Rasco Marcus A. MiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API