Legal Opinion
United States v. Nathan Wall (95-5007) and Donald Wall (95-5008)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 22, 1996No. 95-5007, 95-5008PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSiler, J., joined by Coffman, D.J.,
BOGGS, J. (pp. 1454-85), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
SILER, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Nathan and Donald Wall appeal the district court’s denial of their motion to dismiss the information charging them with operating an illegal gambling business. They entered conditional pleas of guilty to a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1955.1 Defendants aver constitutional and statutory construction issues in this appeal. First, they attack the constitutionality of § 1955. Next, they contend that two essential requirements for conviction under § 1955 were not met: five…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- United States v. Sadie Latouf (95-4095), Joseph N. Sarich (95-4112), Mario Guerrieri (95-4115), Richard A. Harakal (95-4233)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Philip A. ChanceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. David J. FarrowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Anthony C. Zizzo, James J. Marcello, Richard Gervasio, Anthony N. Chiaramonti, Brett K. O'dell, and Samuel A. CarlisiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Curtis D. Ables (96-6715) and Jackie Lamkin (96-6643)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.