Legal Opinion
United States v. Samuel D. Sage
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 12, 1996No. 1681, Docket 96-1001PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NICKERSON, District Judge:
This appeal raises the question whether the Child Support Recovery Act of 1992 (the Act), 18 U.S.C. § 228 (1994), is invalid as beyond the constitutional power of Congress to enact.
On July 13, 1995, an information filed in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut charged that defendant-appellant Samuel D. Sage, residing in a State outside Connecticut, willfully failed to make support payments previously ordered by a Connecticut court for his two minor children resident in Connecticut, and that the amount due, more than $5000, had been unpaid…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- United States v. Frank P. Bongiorno, United States of America v. Frank P. BongiornoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- State of Connecticut v. Physicians Health Services of Connecticut, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- City of New York v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Ricky L. HampshireCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Gary Nelson JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.