Legal Opinion
Perez v. Ledesma
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 23, 1971No. 60PublishedCited by 1,054 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
Given our decisions today in No. 2, Younger v. Harris, ante, p. 37; No. 7, Samuels v. Mackell, and No. 9, Fernandez v. Mackell, ante, p. 66; No. 4, Boyle v. Landry, ante, p. 77; No. 83, Byrne v. Karalexis, post, p. 216; and No. 41, Dyson v. Stein, post, p. 200, in which we have determined when it is appropriate for a federal court to intervene in the administration of a State’s criminal laws, the disposition of this case should not be difficult.
I
Ledesma and the other appellees- operated a newsstand in the Parish of St. Bernard, Louisiana, where they displayed for sale allegedly obscene…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Stefanelli v. MinardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Moody v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gunn v. University Committee to End the War in Viet NamSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Delta Book Distributors, Inc. v. CronvichDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,054 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
1,049 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.