Legal Opinion
Davenport v. Medtronic, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 3, 2004No. CIV.A. 00-6105PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ROBERT F. KELLY, Senior District Judge.
Presently pending before this Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant Medtronic, Inc. (“Medtronic”). For the following reasons, Medtronic’s Motion will be granted.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Introduction
Richard Davenport (“Davenport”) filed a Complaint against Medtronic on January 16, 2001. ’ The three-Count Complaint sets forth claims for negligence 1 (Count I), breach of implied and express warranties (Count II) and strict product liability (Count III) based on Davenport’s experience with , the Medtronic Activa Tremor Control System (the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Soufflas v. Zimmer, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Gross v. Stryker Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Parkinson v. Guidant Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Parker v. Stryker Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 2008
- Smith v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.