Soufflas v. Zimmer, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Zimmer’s contemporaneously filed motions to exclude Plaintiffs experts, Drs. Hetzel and Sidor, and its motion for summary judgment. As the ultimate outcome of defendant’s motion for summary judgment is dependant upon the Court’s ruling regarding the admissibility of Plaintiffs experts’ opinions, the Court will address Defendant’s motion to exclude plaintiffs experts and Defendant’s motion for summary judgment seriatim.
This is a product liability case in which Plaintiff Marguerite J. Soufflas claims that three…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Gross v. Stryker Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Smith v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- McLaughlin v. Bayer Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Lewis v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2014
- Runner v. BardDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.