Legal Opinion
Gross v. Stryker Corp.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 14, 2012No. Civil No. 11-1229PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*471 MEMORANDUM OPINION
NORA BARRY FISCHER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In this action, Plaintiff Donald Gross (“Plaintiff’) brings multiple medical device liability claims against Defendants Stryker Corporation t/a/d/b/a Stryker Howmedica Osteonics (“Stryker”); Stryker Orthoppedics [sic], a division of Howmedica Osteonics Corporation; and Stryker Orthopedics, a division of Howmedica Osteonics Corporation,1 whereby he seeks to recover damages, including punitive damages, arising from the surgical implantation of an artificial hip prosthesis known as the Trident System. (See Docket No. 1-3).…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Vickie Thorne v. Pep Boys Manny Moe & JackCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Howard v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Geshke v. Crocs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Smith v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Aaron v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.