Legal Opinion

Shurtleff v. Marcus Land and Investment Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 27, 1922No. Civ. No. 3868PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

The following facts are undisputed: On January 10, 1920, respondent entered into a written contract to purchase a certain tract of land from appellant at an agreed price of $58,245.00; at this time a mortgage upon the property had been foreclosed and about seven months of the period for redemption had expired; on January 23, 1920, the respondent refused to accept title to the land; on February 13th appellant sold the land subject to the mortgage to one Toplitzky for $52,778.10; March 16th following Toplitzky sold to respondent for an advance of $1500 over the price paid by him.

The action is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. PomeroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Drew v. PedlarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Dean v. HawesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. Winnipiseogee Lake Cotton & Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. GilfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Royer v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Major-Blakeney Corp. v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Employees' Participating Assn. v. PineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Beason v. GriffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API