Shurtleff v. Marcus Land and Investment Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
The following facts are undisputed: On January 10, 1920, respondent entered into a written contract to purchase a certain tract of land from appellant at an agreed price of $58,245.00; at this time a mortgage upon the property had been foreclosed and about seven months of the period for redemption had expired; on January 23, 1920, the respondent refused to accept title to the land; on February 13th appellant sold the land subject to the mortgage to one Toplitzky for $52,778.10; March 16th following Toplitzky sold to respondent for an advance of $1500 over the price paid by him.
The action is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. PomeroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Drew v. PedlarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Dean v. HawesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Winnipiseogee Lake Cotton & Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. GilfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Royer v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Major-Blakeney Corp. v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Employees' Participating Assn. v. PineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Beason v. GriffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.