Dean v. Hawes
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County and from an order refusing a new trial. Lucas F. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
In this action the plaintiff sued for and,
upon the verdict of a jury, procured a judgment against the defendant in the sum of six hundred dollars as damages for the alleged breach of an agreement to purchase real estate. The defendant has appealed from the judgment, and from an order denying a new trial, upon the judgment-roll and a statement of the case which purports to show all of the evidence taken upon the trial.
The plaintiff’s cause of action as pleaded is founded substantially upon the following facts: The defendant, in consideration of the sum of eight hundred dollars, executed to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Drew v. PedlarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by9 opinions
- Royer v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Employees' Participating Assn. v. PineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Dean v. HawesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Ingalls v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Beason v. GriffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.