Legal Opinion

Application of Chester John Cavallito and Allan Poe Gray

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided October 10, 1960No. Patent Appeal 6502PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORLEY, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner of claims 1 and 2 of appellants’ application for a patent on Bis-Quaternary Ammonium Substituted Alkanes. No prior art was cited, the rejection being based on the ground of undue breadth. Since the portions of the two appealed claims on which that rejection is based are identical, it will be sufficient to reproduce claim 1 which is as follows:

“1. An a u) -bis-(quaternary-ammonium) -substituted alkane salt, wherein the alkane portion of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. White v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co. v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re SarettUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  2. Application of Oskar Sus and Werner SchaeferCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  3. Application of Alexander R. SurreyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  4. Application of Lewis H. SarettCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  5. Cosden Oil & Chemical Co. v. American Hoechst Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API