Legal Opinion
Application of Janis Robins
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided August 13, 1970No. Patent Appeal 8313PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Judge.
This appeal-is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals 1 affirming the rejection of claims 19-28 of application serial No. 199,644, filed June 4, 1962, entitled “Urethane Elastomers.”
The claims on appeal are directed to a process for producing solid, non-eellular urethane polymers and to the resulting product. Appellant has discovered that “ionizable, halogen-free monoorgano mercuric compounds” are especially useful for catalyzing reactions between compounds having at last one reactive iso cyanate group (— NCO) and compounds having at least one reactive hydroxyl…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Application of Walter L. Borkowski and John J. Van VenrooyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Application of Oskar Sus and Werner SchaeferCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Application of Lynn B. Wakefield and Frederick C. FosterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Application of John Nicholson Gardner, Anthony Maitland Roe and George Lawrence WilleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Application of Alexander R. SurreyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- The Regents of the University of California v. Eli Lilly and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Amgen, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Genetics Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- University of Rochester v. G.D. Searle & Co., Inc., Monsanto Company, Pharmacia Corporation, and Pfizer Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Application of Robert E. Moore and Edward J. JanoskiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Carl F. Swinehart and Marko SfiligojCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.