Legal Opinion
Application of Marwan R. Kamal and Edgar R. Rogier
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided July 3, 1968No. Patent Appeal 7964PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARTHUR M. SMITH, Judge.
The sole issue involved in this appeal from the Patent Office Board of Appeals 1 is whether the claim on appeal complies with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph.
That issue arises in an appeal from the decision of the board, adhered to on reconsideration, affirming the examiner’s rejection of claim 7 of appellants’ application. 2 All of the remaining claims in the application were allowed.
The claim here contended for is:
7. A polymer prepared by reacting the compound of claim 1 with a poly-functional organic compound containing labile hydrogen atoms.
The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In re SarettUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Application of Oskar Sus and Werner SchaeferCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Application of Walter Spormann and Joachim HeinkeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of Walter Grimme, Werner Keil and Heinrich SchmitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Application of Alexander R. SurreyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Application of Walter L. Borkowski and John J. Van VenrooyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- In Re Gilbert P. HyattCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- In re HawkinsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Application of Charles R. BarrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Charles R. BarrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.