Legal Opinion

Wedig v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 16, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee curiam.

John H. Wedig instituted this suit against the appellant, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, to recover damages for injuries he sustained when his automobile collided with defendant’s truck and trailer. Wedig recovered a judgment and pending appellant’s appeal to this court, he died. Representatives of his estate petitioned to be substituted as plaintiff-appellee and appellant filed a plea alleging that by reason of the death of Wedig the suit abated. We sustained appellee’s motion to strike the plea. 278 Ill. App. 378. For convenience, we will refer to appellee as plaintiff.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Morehouse v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Murphy v. HawthorneOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Ruth v. VroomMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Hazel v. Hoopeston-Danville Motor Bus Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Aubin v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carter v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  2. Paul v. GarmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  3. Merback v. BlanchardWyoming Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Warren v. PattonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  5. Budds v. Keeshin Motor Express Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API