Legal Opinion

Hazel v. Hoopeston-Danville Motor Bus Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1923No. 15284PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

The Appellate Court for the Third District reversed, with a finding of fact, a judgment for $8000 against the Hoopeston-Danville Motor Bus Company, recovered by Charles E. Hazel, administrator of the estate of Deloia Hazel, deceased, his wife, for her death from personal injuries received in an automobile collision alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. The finding of fact was “that Charles Hazel, husband of deceased, who is one of the persons for whose benefit this suit was brought, was guilty of negligence, and that such negligence contributed to bring about the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. MajorIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Opp v. PryorIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Wymore v. Mahaska CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  4. Becker v. BillingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Love v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Union Wire Rope Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Nudd v. MatsoukasIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Pasquale v. Speed Products EngineeringIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Wilcox v. BierdIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Duffy v. CortesiIllinois Supreme Court · 1954

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API