Legal Opinion

Larry D. Hysten v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 30, 2002No. 01-3098PublishedCited by 166 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Larry D. Hysten was employed as a journeyman freight car mechanic by defendant Burlington Northern (“Burlington Northern” or “BNSF”) and its predecessor, Santa Fe Railroad, for approximately twenty-two years. His suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 consists of claims that Burlington Northern suspended him for forty days because he is an African-American and then engaged in retaliatory activity designed to punish him for undertaking protected opposition to discrimination. In a published opinion, the district court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Hysten…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by166 opinions

  1. Haynes v. Level 3 Communications, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. Plotke v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. Hinds v. Sprint/United Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. Piercy v. MaketaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. Sorbo v. United Parcel ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API