Legal Opinion
Hinds v. Sprint/United Management Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 22, 2008No. 07-3027PublishedCited by 244 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GORSUCH, Circuit Judge.
Sprint/United Management Company and Sprint Corporation (collectively, “Sprint”) discharged Albert Hinds as part of a reduction in force in which his entire department was eliminated. Mr. Hinds sued, alleging that Sprint discriminated against him on the basis of age and retaliated against him for complaining of age discrimination. The district court granted summary judgment for Sprint on both counts. Because Mr. Hinds does not present evidence from which a reasonable juror could discredit Sprint’s age-neutral explanation for his discharge or conclude that a retaliatory…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at ArmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Kolstad v. American Dental Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Kendrick v. Penske Transportation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by244 opinions
- Johnson v. Weld County, Colo.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. C.R. England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Lounds v. Lincare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Conroy v. VilsackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Daniels v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
239 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.