Legal Opinion

State v. Coy

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 22, 1980No. CR80-1, CA 17273PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P.J.

Defendant was charged with driving under the influence of intoxicants. His pretrial motion to suppress the results of a breathalyzer examination was denied and he was subsequently convicted. He appeals the court’s ruling. We affirm.

On January 1, 1980, at approximately 7:10 p.m., defendant was arrested for driving under the influence of intoxicants. After being transported to jail, the arresting officer gave defendant an opportunity to take a breathalyzer test. Defendant requested a chemical blood test. He was told by the officer that a blood test was available, at his own expense. Having…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. OsburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. State v. AnnenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  3. State v. FreymullerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. State v. CresonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. State v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gundersen v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
  2. State v. HerndonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Gundersen v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API