Legal Opinion

State v. Baxter

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 20, 1978No. 77-10119, CA 10015PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.

The defendant was arrested for driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 487.540. In a pretrial hearing, on defendant’s motion to suppress the results of a breathalyzer test administered to him, the court ruled the test results were not admissible. The ruling was based on the failure of the arresting officer to advise the defendant of the consequences of refusal under the Implied Consent Law. ORS 487.805; 482.540 to 482.560. The state appeals.

Following his arrest defendant was requested to take a breath test. In response, defendant asked if he was required to take the test. The officer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. OsburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. State v. FreymullerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. State v. CresonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. State v. DowningCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. State v. HerndonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. State v. RomeroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API