Legal Opinion

State v. Freymuller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 9, 1976No. 94503, CA 5936PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

Prior to defendant’s trial for drunken driving, he moved to suppress evidence of the breathalyzer test which had been administered to him. The district court granted defendant’s motion. The circuit court affirmed and remanded to the district court for trial. The state appeals to this court.

The stipulated record on appeal to the circuit court shows that when defendant was requested to take a breathalyzer test, he asked the arresting officer: "[D]o I have to take the test?” The officer responded: "[Y]es,” or "yes, you are required to do so by law.” No other conversation concerning the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. AnnenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. ScharfOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Wirz v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. CresonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. State v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. State v. CoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API