State v. Osburn
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.
Defendant was convicted of driving with more than .15 percent alcohol in his blood. ORS 483.999 (1). On appeal lie contends Ms breathalyzer test score should not have been admitted into evidence, because he was nfever informed of certain rights. This contention raises both constitutional and statutory issues.
As we understand the facts from the partial transcript filed with this appeal, defendant was arrested for driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor. ① He was taken to the police station where the arresting officer asked if he would take a breathalyzer test. Defendant agreed, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. FogleOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Heer v. Department of Motor VehiclesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. AnnenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Palmer v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. ScharfOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. StoverOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. WeisharCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.