Legal Opinion

Gundersen v. Municipality of Anchorage

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided September 30, 1988No. A-2112PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before BRYNER, C.J., SINGLETON, J., and STEWART, District Court Judge.* SINGLETON, Judge.

Dale M. Gundersen .was convicted by a jury of driving while intoxicated. Anchorage Municipal Code (AMC) § 09.28.020. He appeals, contending that the trial court erred in refusing to suppress the results of his Intoximeter test. He also challenges the trial court's ruling on jury instructions. We affirm.

*107FACTS

Gundersen was arrested for driving while intoxicated after the vehicle he was driving collided with a parked car and he failed certain field sobriety tests. He was given an Intoximeter test and…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gundersen v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. MessnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Municipality of Anchorage v. RayCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1993
  4. State v. MurtaghAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Ahtuangaruak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API