Legal Opinion
Moore v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 10, 1992No. Nos. 91-16160, 91-16263PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TANG, Circuit Judge:
Permanente Medical Group, Inc. (“Per-manente”), Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Inc. (“Kaiser”), and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) appeal from the district court’s order awarding attorney’s fees to Ophelia Moore, individually, as guardian ad litem for LaVonda Atkinson, Vonnetta Atkinson and Christopher Moore, and as administra-trix of the estate of DeWanda Atkinson (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), after remand of the action to the Superior Court of California. We are called upon to decide whether attorney’s fees…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Willy v. Coastal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Greenberg v. SalaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Padilla v. AT & T CORP.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Jeffrey A. Mints v. Educational Testing ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Robert Stallworth v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority David Vegh and Ronald ToberCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Dawne Baddie Patricia L. Smith v. Berkeley Farms, Inc. Doug Sheehan Gilbert Rodriguez, Beverly BazemoreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Valmont Industries, Inc., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.