Legal Opinion
Robert Stallworth v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority David Vegh and Ronald Tober
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 21, 1997No. 95-4065PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOGGS, Circuit Judge.
After prevailing in a motion to remand this removed case to state court, Robert Stall-worth moved for an award of attorney fees, 1 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(e). 2 The district court denied that motion for procedural reasons, based on its interpretation of the remand statute. Stallworth now appeals that denial. Because we disagree with the district court’s interpretation, we remand.
I
Stallworth first sued the Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (“GCRTA”) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. §§…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- United States v. Community Health Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Stephen Michael Ridder v. City of Springfield, Clark CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Warthman v. Genoa Township Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- State of Wisconsin v. Hotline Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Citizens for a Better Environment v. The Steel Company, Also Known as Chicago Steel and Pickling CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.