Legal Opinion

Dawne Baddie Patricia L. Smith v. Berkeley Farms, Inc. Doug Sheehan Gilbert Rodriguez, Beverly Bazemore

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 23, 1995No. 93-17187PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:

OVERVIEW

This ease considers whether 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) authorized the district court to award defendants their fees incurred between removal and remand, where both removal and the subsequent remand were proper.

Section 1447(e) authorizes the district court when remanding a ease to award costs and fees incurred as a result of the removal. Shortly after this action was properly removed to federal court on the basis of federal subject matter jurisdiction, plaintiffs dismissed all federal claims and secured a remand. In its order of remand, the district court found that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moore v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Carolyn R. Hurd v. Ralphs Grocery Company, and United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local No. 324Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Barraclough v. ADP Automotive Claims Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1993
  4. Vaughan v. McArthur Bros.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  5. Clark v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Balcorta v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Millar v. Bay Area Rapid Transit DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
  3. Easton v. Crossland Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. Horne v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
  5. Kunlgunda Dirauf v. Lawrence BergerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API