Legal Opinion

Foster v. Bock

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 25, 1949No. 35,006PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Appeal from an order denying defendants’ motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial.

On November 6, 1947, at about 6:30 p. m., plaintiff drove her automobile in the city of Brainerd in a westerly direction upon Nor-wood street and its intersection with Eighth street. Simultaneously, the automobile of defendant Addie Bock was driven south over Eighth street and into said intersection, where the two vehicles collided. Plaintiff was severely injured. The Bock car was occupied by Addie Bock’s 14-year-old son, Balph (one of the defendants herein), and his 16-year-old companion,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moore v. KujathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Hardware Mutual Casualty v. SameCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  3. Kerns v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Storey v. WeinbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  5. Carlson v. FredsallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Kolatz v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Ryan v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Dahlberg v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Buckey v. Indianhead Truck Line, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Froden v. RanzenbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API