Hardware Mutual Casualty v. Same
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.
Recovery was had in these two suits on a policy of automobile insurance issued to the owner, by judgment creditors of a person using the car with the owner’s consent, and held liable for damages caused in a collision. The insurer denies liability under the terms of the policy. The cases have been argued together.
Vaughn S. Gordy was the owner, and his policy contained the omnibus clause insurance “not only the named insured but also any person while using the automobile and any person or organization legally responsible for the use thereof * * * provided further that the actual use is with the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Grant v. KnepperNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Arcara v. MoresseNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. BeverfordenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Cohen v. American Home Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. Metropolitan Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- DeJarnette v. Federal Kemper InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Federal Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.