Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Fredsall

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 27, 1949No. Nos. 34,663, 34,676PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice.

This action to recover for personal injuries was originally brought against defendants Robert A. Fredsall and John Herseth. Thereafter, the complaint was amended so as to include as defendants Minneapolis Street Railway Company and Lloyd A. Worthley. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff against all defendants. Defendants Fredsall and the Minneapolis Street Railway Company and Worthley have appealed separately from an order denying their respective alternative motions for judgment or a new trial. The appeals have been consolidated here. Defendant Herseth has not…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Purcell v. St. Paul City Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Cruikshank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  3. Kerns v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Vogel v. D. M. Osborne & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  5. Seward v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. Mitchell v. BranchHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Johnson v. Flex-O-Lite Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. Lines v. RyanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API