Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. Ritter
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Canadian County; Edward Dewes Oldfield, Judge. Suit by the Emerson-Brantingham Implement Company against Christ Ritter. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
AVEST, O.
This was a suit instituted in the district court of Canadian county by plaintiff in error against defendant in error to' recover money judgment ux>on eight certain promissory notes, and to recover the possession of certain personal property set out in said mortgage, which mortgage was given to secure the payment of said notes. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the court below.
'To plaintiff’s canse of action the defendant answered denying generally the allegations of plaintiff's petition,, and, further that said notes were given and said mortgage executed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mullen v. ThaxtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Continental Gin Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- McFadyen and Brown v. MastersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
- Ricker Nat. Bank v. StoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Port Huron Engine & Thresher Co. v. BallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mounts v. Boardman Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Leasure v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Daniel v. PappasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Loveland v. LoafmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Perry v. Jenkins Music Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.