Legal Opinion

Mullen v. Thaxton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 14, 1909No. 198PublishedCited by 65 opinions

Error from District Court, Love County; 8. H. Russell, Judge. Action by J. S. Mullen against S. H. Thaxton. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. citing: Mechem on Agency, § 276; Chaffe v. Stubbs, 37 La. Ann. 656; Van Eppes v 'Smith, 21 Ala. 317; Mfg. Co. v. Whitehurst, 72 Fed. 496; Hayes v. Campbell, 63 Cal. 133; Davidson v. Porter, 57 111. 300 ; Tidwick v. Rice, IS Iowa, 214; Dayton x.

Read the full summary

Error from District Court, Love County; 8. H. Russell, Judge. Action by J. S. Mullen against S. H. Thaxton. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. citing: Mechem on Agency, § 276; Chaffe v. Stubbs, 37 La. Ann. 656; Van Eppes v 'Smith, 21 Ala. 317; Mfg. Co. v. Whitehurst, 72 Fed. 496; Hayes v. Campbell, 63 Cal. 133; Davidson v. Porter, 57 111. 300 ; Tidwick v. Rice, IS Iowa, 214; Dayton x. Burford, 18 Minn. 126; Berry v. Anderson, 22 Ind. 36. citing: Mechem on Agency, §■§ 6, 283, 284, 278, 106, 310, 312, 395, 279-283; Union, etc., Co. v. Mallory, etc., Co. (111.) 48 Am. St. Rep.…

1Opinion of the Court

Kane, C. J.-

This was an action, instituted in the United States Court for the Southern District of the Indian Territory, at Ardmore, by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against the defendant in error, to recover on a promissory note in the sum of $487-50. An attachment was sued out and levied upon 60 acres of cotton and 30 acres of corn, both ungathered, 2 pair of mules, and 20 head of hogs belonging to the defendant, and he was appointed custodian, and continued in charge thereof until the trial of the cause. For answer the defendant alleged, in substance, that he signed and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Law v. CrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  2. Frick v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  3. Ricker Nat. Bank v. StoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Citizen Bank v. CareyCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1899
  5. Noble v. WorthyCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Adams v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Jacobsen v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Wingate v. RenderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Porter v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API