Legal Opinion

Ricker Nat. Bank v. Stone

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 8, 1908No. 691, Ind. TPublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the United States Court for the Southern District of the Indian Territory, Sitting at Chickasha; J. T. Dickerson, Judge. Action by R. E. Stone against the Bicker National Bank. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

KaNE, J..This was an action commenced by the appellee, plaintiff below, against the Bicker National Bank, the appellant, defendant below, to recover a certain sum of money which the plaintiff alleged was due him from the defendant on account of personal services rendered. It seems that during tbe year 1900 and thereafter the defendant employed one 0. M. Smith to solicit loans for it at the stockyards at Kansas City, Mo.; that said Smith also kept a general oversight of its loans on cattle, with a view to the preservation of the security and the protection of the interests of the bank. During…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. National Exchange Bank of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Adams' Express Co. v. TregoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  3. Nicholson v. GoldenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Doan, King & Co. v. DuncanIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Pacific Lumber Co. v. MoffatCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mullen v. ThaxtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Horton v. EarlySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Massachusetts Bonding Ins. Co. v. VanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. SuttonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Brownell v. MooreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API