Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Pappas

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 6, 1923No. 11343PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Tulsa County: L. J. Martin, Judge- Action by R. T. Daniel against Peter Pap-pas. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error-

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JARMAN, C.

This was an action by R. T. Daniel against Peter Pappas to enjoin the defendant from conducting a cafe or restaurant in a certain building leased by the plaintiff to the defendant and from furnishing meals and lunches and similar articles of food. Judgment was rendered for the defendant, from which the plaintiff brings error.

The plaintiff was the owner of a certain store room known as No- 107 E. Third street, located in the Daniel building in the city of Tulsa, Okla.; the plaintiff was in Florida and said property was in' the hands of E. H. Young as the agent of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strange v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Prowant v. SealySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. SuttonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Jones v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. National Surety Co. v. MiozranySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mercury Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Snow v. WinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Cities Service Oil Co. v. Geolograph Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Consolidated Flour Mills Co. v. MueggeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. Home Builders Ass'n of RealtorsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API