Legal Opinion

Continental Gin Co. v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 22, 1915No. 4543PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error from District Court, Carter County; S. H. Russell, Judge. Action by the Continental Gin Conipany against G. F. Sullivan. Judgment was rendered on the verdict and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BRETT, C.

The plaintiff in error in this action was plaintiff below, and the parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant as they appeared in the lower court.

The plaintiff filed suit in the district court of Carter county against the defendant to recover a balance of $1,271.31, alleged to be due on certain notes given by defendant to plaintiff, and to foreclose a real estate mortgage securing same, and for a balance on an open account of $29.41.

Defendant answered by general denial, admitting the execution of the notes and mortgage, but pleaded as a defense that the notes…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Port Huron Engine & Thresher Co. v. BallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Callahan Co. v. Chickasha Etc. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  3. W. P. Callahan & Co. v. Chickasha Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  4. Wiggins v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Hale v. Van Buren, Heck & Marvin Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Holland Banking Co. v. DicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Citizens Nat. Bank of Orange, Va. v. WaughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  3. Williams v. FreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Kerr v. McKinneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. RitterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API