Legal Opinion

Leasure v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 1919No. 8713PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error from District Court, Major County; James B. Oullison, Judge. Action by H. W. Moyers against John Leasure. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error, and after plaintiff’s death pending appeal the cause was revived in the name of J. 0. Hughes as executor.

1Opinion of the CourtHardy, C. J.

H. W. Moyers commenced this action against John Leasure to recover an alleged balance due for the purchase price of a certain stock of merchandise, and recover judgment. After appeal was perfected to this court plaintiff died, and the cause was revived in the name of J. O. Hughes as executor of the last will and testament of said Moyers.

The contract by which Moyers sold the stock of goods to defendant was in writing, and the conveying clause is as follows:

“That for and in consideration of the st.p-ulations, agreements and covenants hereinafter mentioned, party of the first parr agrees to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Howe v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. SuttonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Brownell v. MooreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Colonial Jewelry Co. v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co. v. Lyons Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Berry v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Mounts v. Boardman Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Woodmont, Inc. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  4. Farmers State Bank of Newkirk v. HessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Finefrock v. CarneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API