State v. Corona
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DALY, J.
The defendant, Ulices Corona, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a trial to a three judge court, of manslaughter in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-55 (a) (l).1 On appeal, the defendant claims (1) that there was an improper bifurcation of the fact-finding function of the three judge court and (2) that there was insufficient evidence of his intent to cause serious physical injury to the victim to support a conviction for manslaughter in the first degree. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The court reasonably could…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Rosenblit v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Mozell v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. FabricatoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Gagne v. VaccaroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. ArlukConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.