Legal Opinion

Mozell v. Commissioner of Correction

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 14, 2009No. SC 18196PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

Following a second habeas corpus trial, the petitioner, Dana Mozell, appeals 1 from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that: (1) he was denied due process of law when the first habeas court declared a mistrial after receiving most of the evidence; (2) he was denied due process of law when the second habeas court denied his petition based, in part, on its reliance on the transcripts from the petitioner’s first habeas corpus trial to which both parties had stipulated; (3) he received…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. New York v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. State v. KitchensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  2. State v. DARRYL W.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  3. State v. BellamySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  4. Sanders v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  5. State v. FosterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API